Nicolas Bordon de Moraes vs ROBERTO RABELLO NE...

This match featured a dominant performance by Athlete 1, who secured multiple takedowns and guard passes to build a solid lead on the scoreboard. Athlete 1 controlled the pace with strong top pressure, effectively passing guard and maintaining side control for the majority of the fight. Athlete 2 showed resilience with active guard play, managing to score a sweep and attempt an armbar from guard, but was unable to capitalize further. The fight was largely positional, with Athlete 1 dictating the action and Athlete 2 focusing on defensive guard work and scramble attempts. The scoreboard clearly reflects Athlete 1's control and point accumulation, leading to a decisive victory by points.

1. 0:02

   position change

   Nicolas Bordon de Moraes

   Fight starts standing, both athletes neutral.

   standingneutral
2. 0:04

   takedown

   Nicolas Bordon de Moraes

   +2 pts

   Athlete 1 scores a takedown, gaining top half guard position.

   takedowntop controlhalf guard
3. 0:10

   guard pass

   Nicolas Bordon de Moraes

   +3 pts

   Athlete 1 passes guard to side control, increasing point lead.

   guard passpressureside control
4. 0:16

   sweep

   ROBERTO RABELLO NE...

   +2 pts

   Athlete 2 executes a successful sweep from closed guard, scoring 2 points.

   sweepclosed guardguard player
5. 0:20

   submission attempt

   ROBERTO RABELLO NE...

   Athlete 2 attempts an armbar from guard but fails to finish.

   submission attemptarmbarguard player
6. 0:24

   guard pass

   Nicolas Bordon de Moraes

   +3 pts

   Athlete 1 passes guard again to side control, extending lead to 6-1.

   guard passpressureside control
7. 1:00

   position change

   Nicolas Bordon de Moraes

   Athlete 1 maintains dominant top position throughout the match.

   top controlpressure

Athlete 1's strategy of aggressive takedowns followed by pressure-based guard passing proved effective, limiting Athlete 2's offensive opportunities. Maintaining top control and transitioning smoothly between half guard and side control allowed Athlete 1 to accumulate points steadily. Athlete 2 could improve by developing more dynamic sweep setups and submission chains to threaten the top player more consistently. Additionally, better guard retention and recovery could help Athlete 2 neutralize pressure and create more scoring chances. Both athletes showed solid fundamentals, but Athlete 1's top game and control were the key differentiators in this match.