RODRIGO VIEIRA DOS R. vs TAREK ALEJANDRO C.

This fight started with both athletes standing and no score on the board. Athlete 1 successfully executed a takedown around the 58-second mark, scoring 2 points and gaining top control. Athlete 2 recovered guard and actively attempted sweeps and an armbar submission, showing good guard retention and offensive attempts. However, these attempts did not result in points or a submission. Athlete 1 capitalized on a guard pass opportunity, moving to side control and scoring an additional 3 points. The fight ended with athlete 1 leading 5-0 on points, with no submissions finished. The scoreboard was visible at the start and end, confirming the score progression.

1. 0:02

   start

   RODRIGO VIEIRA DOS R.

   Fight starts with both athletes standing, no score on scoreboard

   standingneutral
2. 0:58

   takedown

   RODRIGO VIEIRA DOS R.

   +2 pts

   highlight

   Athlete 1 executes a successful takedown, scoring 2 points on the scoreboard

   takedowntop controlpressure
3. 1:02

   guard

   TAREK ALEJANDRO C.

   Athlete 2 recovers closed guard with active grips, attempts sweep and submission

   guard playsubmission attemptsweep attempt
4. 1:06

   submission attempt

   TAREK ALEJANDRO C.

   Athlete 2 attempts an armbar from guard but fails to finish

   submission attemptguard player
5. 1:10

   guard pass

   RODRIGO VIEIRA DOS R.

   +3 pts

   highlight

   Athlete 1 successfully passes guard to side control, scoring 3 points on scoreboard

   guard passtop controlpressure
6. 1:14

   position control

   RODRIGO VIEIRA DOS R.

   Athlete 1 maintains dominant side control position, controlling the pace

   side controltop gamepressure
7. 1:18

   end

   RODRIGO VIEIRA DOS R.

   Fight ends with athlete 1 leading 5-0 on points, no submissions finished

   fight end

Athlete 1's strategy of securing a takedown early and maintaining top control proved effective, allowing them to control the pace and score points through guard passing. Their pressure-oriented top game limited athlete 2's offensive options. Athlete 2 showed resilience and guard retention skills, attempting sweeps and submissions, but was unable to convert these into points or finishes. To improve, athlete 2 could focus on more effective sweep setups and submission entries to capitalize on advantages. Athlete 1 could enhance their submission hunting to finish fights more decisively rather than relying solely on points.